Can't believe I started this in 2009

Haven't posted in a while guess blogs are just out of style.
Unless I guess, its news they are about.
Those are still around, but dwindling to video.
Twitter and the other social networks,
are reducing our capacity to think.
But hey I guess there fun and easy.

Occupation is no answer

By Roman Savchenko
Letter to the editor
The Vancouger: WSUV Student Newspaper

The Occupy movement is gaining popularity across the county. We even have local branches

of this movement in Portland and Vancouver, USA. Within the past few months, most young

people have heard of the movement, but how many of us actually know what it’s all about?

Ask this question to the common Occupy protester and you will get answers like: “It’s about

socioeconomic injustice” or “It’s about equality for the 99 percent!” or “We want a return

to ‘real’ democracy.” These so-called “goals” are more vague than a five-year-old’s college

plans.

Imagine yourself as part of the upper one percent. You see the protests. You realize that you

want to do something to help. What are you supposed to do? No one is asking for anything

specific.

Even if the protests convince some people that there is socioeconomic inequality, what do the

protesters propose we do about it? Should the rich one percent give their possessions to the poor

like the Communists’ suggest? Or maybe we should tax the rich to the point where all our good

business people move overseas. The movement simply doesn’t have a clear realizable goal.

The Occupy movement not only has vague goals it targets the wrong problem. The cause of

socioeconomic inequality is not a problem with our government or tax system, but a problem

with humans themselves. People are not inherently good. Therefore, even if everyone were to

suddenly become equal, it would not last. A new group of people will always rise to oppress

others. History’s brightest example of this is the former Soviet Union, which was founded on

ideas of regulated equality that never worked out. Protesting about replacing the upper-class or

corporations will not fix the root of our problem.

Best Tea Ever

I just discovered Teavana tea. They have some really nice blends. Although their teas get quite pricey going roughly from five to thirty dollars an ounce (there is a two ounce purchase minimum).

This time I bought some "Youthberry White Tea." It's a great first time tea, but next time I plan to get something more bold. I'm particularly interested in their Mate tea, since I love coffee.

Their main product is the tea leaves, but if you are there in person you can get some tea in a cup (picture on left) $4.99 for a 16oz. Be careful though tea tends to be much hotter than most coffees which you might be use to.

Cool little math problem

In a given town monogamous 2/3 of the men are married to 3/5 of the women. There are at least 100 men in the town.

What is the least possible number of men and women in the town?

m= number of men, w=number of women
(2/3)m = (3/5)w , we want lowest integer for m and w

m = (9/10)w,     with m greater-than or equal to 100
w = (10/9)m

Since w = (10/9)m,      9 divides m

Lowest number of men that is divisible by nine is 108

So we have that w = (10/9)(108) = 120

we conclude that:
(2/3)(108)= 72 men
(3/5)(120)= 72 women

Writing

It's been a while since I last posted... I'll blame that on my business with school. And so with finals coming up (tomorrow) I desired to distract myself from my studies and do a bit of writing. I realized that in the Computer Science field one doesn't get to write much. At least not in the traditional sense. I do get to write a lot of code and draw many diagrams/schematics, but its not the same.

Its interesting that God gave us different ways of expressing our thoughts. One might say that the mathematical method is more precise, and to a certain extent they would be correct. When I write an equation or truth-table there is no room left for ambiguity. Any reader that picks up my work will know exactly what I meant to say and how the concept I'm describing works.

This is not the case in the practice of writing. Things can be ambiguous, in many cases this is considered poetic. The great thing about language is that thoughts can be expressed in a myriad of tints and colors. Literature and poetry allow us to express the emotional spin that we all put on a given truth. This is a fun thing to think about -- Humans are not computers they will not always do exactly as their told. They can not only comprehend but also reason feel experience reality.