Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Occupation is no answer
By Roman Savchenko
Letter to the editor
The Vancouger: WSUV Student Newspaper
The Occupy movement is gaining popularity across the county. We even have local branches
of this movement in Portland and Vancouver, USA. Within the past few months, most young
people have heard of the movement, but how many of us actually know what it’s all about?
Ask this question to the common Occupy protester and you will get answers like: “It’s about
socioeconomic injustice” or “It’s about equality for the 99 percent!” or “We want a return
to ‘real’ democracy.” These so-called “goals” are more vague than a five-year-old’s college
plans.
Imagine yourself as part of the upper one percent. You see the protests. You realize that you
want to do something to help. What are you supposed to do? No one is asking for anything
specific.
Even if the protests convince some people that there is socioeconomic inequality, what do the
protesters propose we do about it? Should the rich one percent give their possessions to the poor
like the Communists’ suggest? Or maybe we should tax the rich to the point where all our good
business people move overseas. The movement simply doesn’t have a clear realizable goal.
The Occupy movement not only has vague goals it targets the wrong problem. The cause of
socioeconomic inequality is not a problem with our government or tax system, but a problem
with humans themselves. People are not inherently good. Therefore, even if everyone were to
suddenly become equal, it would not last. A new group of people will always rise to oppress
others. History’s brightest example of this is the former Soviet Union, which was founded on
ideas of regulated equality that never worked out. Protesting about replacing the upper-class or
corporations will not fix the root of our problem.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Best Tea Ever
I just discovered Teavana tea. They have some really nice blends. Although their teas get quite pricey going roughly from five to thirty dollars an ounce (there is a two ounce purchase minimum).
This time I bought some "Youthberry White Tea." It's a great first time tea, but next time I plan to get something more bold. I'm particularly interested in their Mate tea, since I love coffee.
Their main product is the tea leaves, but if you are there in person you can get some tea in a cup (picture on left) $4.99 for a 16oz. Be careful though tea tends to be much hotter than most coffees which you might be use to.
This time I bought some "Youthberry White Tea." It's a great first time tea, but next time I plan to get something more bold. I'm particularly interested in their Mate tea, since I love coffee.
Their main product is the tea leaves, but if you are there in person you can get some tea in a cup (picture on left) $4.99 for a 16oz. Be careful though tea tends to be much hotter than most coffees which you might be use to.
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Cool little math problem
In a given town monogamous 2/3 of the men are married to 3/5 of the women. There are at least 100 men in the town.
What is the least possible number of men and women in the town?
m= number of men, w=number of women
(2/3)m = (3/5)w , we want lowest integer for m and w
m = (9/10)w, with m greater-than or equal to 100
w = (10/9)m
Since w = (10/9)m, 9 divides m
Lowest number of men that is divisible by nine is 108
So we have that w = (10/9)(108) = 120
we conclude that:
(2/3)(108)= 72 men
(3/5)(120)= 72 women
What is the least possible number of men and women in the town?
m= number of men, w=number of women
(2/3)m = (3/5)w , we want lowest integer for m and w
m = (9/10)w, with m greater-than or equal to 100
w = (10/9)m
Since w = (10/9)m, 9 divides m
Lowest number of men that is divisible by nine is 108
So we have that w = (10/9)(108) = 120
we conclude that:
(2/3)(108)= 72 men
(3/5)(120)= 72 women
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)